Unfair practices & Delay in handing over the possession by real estate developers & builders.

Delay in handing over the possession by real estate developers & builder.

Today the land business is one most thriving industry in India. The interest for private and business property is expanding continuously as is the quantity of builders and developers who offer extraordinary highlights to pull an increase of sales of the real estate properties of their. A significant job is played by manufacturers and designers in the redevelopment of housing societies.

The expansion in the interest and the offered guarantees doesn’t guarantee that the guarantees will satisfied on schedule. Non conveyance of possession / ownership on time is one of the major reason of clash between the buyer and builder. There are various situations where developers have taken more time on which they agreed upon resulting in financial loss to buyers in one way or another. Late government endorsements, getting the certificate of completion, delay in getting raw material, concrete and steel acquisition, labor delay and so forth are a portion of the main considerations that add to the deferral caused in dealing with over the possession to the purchasers.

At all be the explanation, the delay in fulfillment of the project / venture influences the general spending plan of a developer and directly affects the purchaser. On the off chance that the purchaser has made sure about a home credit for the apartment, its reimbursement plan is treated as pre-EMI till the purchaser gets the property’s possession. Under sections 24 (b) and 80 (c) of the Income-Tax Act 1961, a purchaser is eligible for tax rebate but only after securing possession of the property and accordingly beginning of EMI. Till at that point, he gets no expense help or tax rebate on the pre-EMI. In this manner, the purchaser needs to pay the EMIs of the bank and furthermore the lease for his present rented accommodation. The money related loss and mental agony that the purchaser needs to confront can’t be repaid aside from by giving him the possession of his home.

Other than the late conveyance of the ownership, various different misbehavior are whined against the developers. Deficit in providing service, lacking in amenities, leakage in roof, problems in drainage system, inadequate fire safety system, inferior quality of electrical wiring, ill-advised water arrangements, not giving the occupation certificate, and so forth are a portion of the significant complaints against the developers.

Addition of a penalty clause which is one-sided in support of themselves is likewise one of the unreasonable practices submitted by the developers and builders. In the vast majority of the cases, the arrangement contains a penalty provision wherein the purchaser is charged a penalty at the rate of 18% for postponed / late installments in the buying of apartment, when the builder defers the conveyance of a similar flat, the rate at which the developer pays is just at the rate of about 1 – 2 % demonstrating an unjustifiably loaded agreement.

Safety measures to be taken by a prospective purchaser

Prior to purchasing a house, a purchaser must do an intensive due diligence of the structure / building. An imminent purchaser should completely experience the original copy of the agreement with the developer. One must check the original documents of the property. The title of the Vendor to the property must be clear and attractive. The purchaser must pursuit the title re port throughout the previous few years.

One should likewise confirm whether the developer has acquired non agricultural permission for the land from the collector. And also one should likewise confirm the development agreement between the owner of land and the developer.

He should request the duplicate of order under the Urban Land Ceiling Act. One should also check the structure plans authorized by the competent authority and the commencement certificate granted by Corporation / Nagar Palika. One should likewise request the building completion certificate (if accessible).

Purchaser should likewise check the structure/ building bye-laws in the region to confirm any issue with setback, side setback, height and so on. One must also confirm with the vender the exchange expenses, stamp duty and registration charges to be paid on buying of the property just as outgoings to be paid for the property. The deal arrangement must be examined in detail. It ought to have the municipal-approved plan of the apartment, carpet area with the region of the galleries / balconies indicated independently, cost of the property including the proportionate cost of common areas and facilities demonstrated independently and time spans at which installments might be paid. It must also be checked that the proper stamp duty has been paid.


A purchaser who is the victim of the unfair trade practices of the developer can move toward the following forums for his redressal:

One can file a civil suit in a Civil Court
One can submit a complaint before the consumer Forum
One can file a complaint before the Competition Commission of India
One can approach Regulatory Forums
One can file a Criminal Case

Civil Court
Respected Supreme Court has held that a purchaser has the option to move toward the Civil Court or the Forum under the Consumer Protection Act for relief in a circumstance where the developer commits breach of his commitments. There are well laws, for example, the Maharashtra Ownership Flats Act or the Development Control Rules under which the case can be filed under the watchful eye of a Civil Court for harms for refund of sum and interest on the said sum.

Respected Supreme Court has held that commercials welcoming applications for distribution without having title to the impugned sites was misleading and unfair practice of the developer. For another situation it has held that a provision containing an acceleration cost in a flat buyer’s arrangement without uncovering the most extreme amount added up to vesting of unrestricted power to build the expense of the apartment and this is unfair practice by builder. In the event that a developer utilizes unacceptable material in development of a flat or makes bogus misleading representations about the state of the house then it is denial of the facility or benefit of which a buyer is entitled to claim value.

Consumer Forum
The Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is the Act which tries to accommodate better assurance of the interests of buyers / consumers. Any individual who employs any services for consideration is a buyer / consumer under the Act. It gives solutions for a buyer / consumer against inadequate services. At the point when a land is assigned or created by a statutory authority or it develops a house to assist an everyday person, it is as such, “service” as by a developer or builder. At the point when the possession of the land / flat / apartment isn’t conveyed inside specified period, the deferral so caused is denial of “service”. Such argument or claims are named as insufficiency in delivering of service of specific norm, quality or grade. An individual who applies for distribution of building site or for an apartment built by the Development Authority or went into a deal with a developer or a contractor is an expected client and the idea of development is covered in the expression ‘service’ of any explanation. Hence, the Consumer Protection Act gives security against the misbehavior of the developers and builders. Any individual disappointed by the service or delay in possession can move toward the consumer forum for his / her redressal. The buyers can move toward the Redressal Forums for insufficiency in service at various phases of construction.

The Consumer Protection Act gives a three level machinery to redressal of buyers complaints. The first level is The District Forum. The District Forums are set up in each District and have power/ jurisdiction to engage grievances where the estimation of products or services and the compensation if any, claiming amount doesn’t surpass Rs. 20,00,000 (Twenty Lakhs). The State Commission is set up in each state and have power/ jurisdiction to engage / entertain complaints / grievances where the estimation of products or services and the compensation if any, claiming amount surpasses rupees twenty lakhs yet doesn’t surpass rupees one crore. The National Commission has jurisdiction to engage grievances where the estimation of the products or services and compensation if any claimed surpasses rupees one crore. A purchaser can submit any grievance / complaint in the consumer forum against the developer or builder or contractor. The grievance should be filled within 2 years from the date of disagreement or argument with the developer or builder or contractor.

The Supreme Court in a recent landmark judgment has held that when the possession of the property isn’t given throughout to the allottee in time it adds up to denial of service and the allottee, who has been influenced by the postponement is entitled to compensation.

Also, National Commission in a judgment has held that the allottee is qualified for quit an undertaking if there is a delay in delivery possession of the house by the builder. It was additionally held that the allottee is qualified for a refund of the whole cash with interest and any deduction on the said sum is unjustified. In another judgment it was held that a manufacturer can’t decline to pay interest on the refund, if the refund is on the account of deficiency of service rendered by real estate developers, or on account of unfair trade practice by builder.

Post your reviews / feedback or experience if you have anything to share by clicking on the following button.

Also, you can read latest Real Estate Builder & Developers complaints here.